301 vs X2CrNiN18-7: 49% composition overlap. Significantly different materials serving different application areas.
301 vs X2CrNiN18-7
Side-by-side chemical composition and mechanical property comparison.
Overview
301
1.4310
Austenitic stainless steel with the highest work-hardening rate of all 300-series grades. Lower Cr and Ni (17/7 vs 18/9 for 304) makes it metastable — cold working induces martensite transformation for extreme strength (UTS >1300 MPa in full-hard temper). THE stainless spring steel. Used for stainless springs, washers, clips, structural components requiring high strength + corrosion resistance, and railway car bodies.
X2CrNiN18-7
1.4318
Nitrogen-alloyed work-hardening austenitic — AISI 301LN. Lower Ni (6-8%) than 304 makes it metastable: cold work transforms austenite to martensite → UTS up to 1400 MPa in full-hard condition. N addition compensates low C for corrosion and strength. Used for rail car bodies, springs, structural parts requiring high strength-to-weight ratio, and architectural cladding.
| 301 | X2CrNiN18-7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Material Number | 1.4310 | 1.4318 |
| Category | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Standard | EN 10088-2 | EN 10088-2 |
Chemical composition (wt%)
| Element | 301 | X2CrNiN18-7 | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|
| C | 0.05–0.15% | 0–0.03% | No overlap |
| Si | 0–2% | 0–1% | OK |
| Mn | 0–2% | 0–2% | OK |
| P | 0–0.045% | — | — |
Mechanical properties
| Property | 301 | X2CrNiN18-7 | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| tensile_strength | 520–720 | 550–750 | MPa |
| yield_strength | ≥ 205 | ≥ 250 | MPa |
| elongation | ≥ 45 | ≥ 40 | % |
Compatibility Assessment
301 and X2CrNiN18-7 have significantly different compositions (49% overlap). These materials are not interchangeable and serve different application areas.
Automated assessment based on composition analysis
Frequently Asked Questions
Is 301 the same as X2CrNiN18-7?
301 and X2CrNiN18-7 have a 49% composition overlap. They are generally not directly interchangeable.
Can I replace 301 with X2CrNiN18-7?
Generally not recommended. The compositions differ significantly (49% overlap). These materials have different alloying concepts and are intended for different applications.
What is the difference between 301 and X2CrNiN18-7?
The main differences are in the following elements: C, N. 301 is a Stainless Steel grade, while X2CrNiN18-7 is a Stainless Steel grade.
Related Comparisons
View full data for each material:
Data provided for reference only. Always verify against the applicable specification for critical applications.
All data is for reference only. Equivalents indicate similarity, not identity. Always verify against the applicable specification for safety-critical applications. materialref.com accepts no liability for decisions based on this data.